RegCheck

Your output. Simplified.

A check of Experiment 2 from Hughes, Cummins & Hussey, 2023.

Hypothesis Study Feature Information in paper Preregistered Protocol
Match**
Page-tracing for claims coming soon!
M1: AMP effect will be demonstrated Sample size before exclusions 214 150 TRUE
M1: AMP effect will be demonstrated Sample size after exclusions 147 150 FALSE
M1: AMP effect will be demonstrated Planned variable(s) to measure/test Valence Ratings (pleasant or unpleasant) of the target stimulus Evaluations within the AMP as pleasant or unpleasant TRUE
M1: AMP effect will be demonstrated Planned processing/scoring Model acknowledges non-independence of multiple data points; modeled trial type as random slope within random intercept for participant, modeling prime identity as random intercept Frequentist logistic mixed-effects model; include subject ID as random intercept TRUE
M1: AMP effect will be demonstrated Planned statistical model logistic mixed-effects model: Valence Ratings ~ Prime Valence + (1 | Participant) logistic mixed-effects model: valence_rating ~ prime_valence + (1 | subject) TRUE
H1: Influence of prime valence moderated by trials influenced by prime stimulus Planned variable(s) to measure/test Interaction: prime valence and influence awareness (influence-aware vs. non-influence-aware) Interaction: prime valence and reported influence TRUE
H1: Influence of prime valence moderated by trials influenced by prime stimulus Planned processing/scoring Extended model by adding influence awareness as fixed effect Reported influence + prime valence interaction TRUE
H1: Influence of prime valence moderated by trials influenced by prime stimulus Planned statistical model logistic mixed-effects model: Valence Ratings ~ Prime Valence * Influence Awareness + (1 | Participant) logistic mixed-effects model: valence_rating ~ prime_valence * reported_influence + (1 | subject) TRUE
H2: Magnitude of AMP effect predicted by proportion of influenced trials to non-influenced trials Planned variable(s) to measure/test AMP effect size and proportion of influenced trials AMP effect size and proportion of influenced trials TRUE
H2: Magnitude of AMP effect predicted by proportion of influenced trials to non-influenced trials Planned processing/scoring Proportion of influenced trials computed as influenced trials divided by total trials Proportion of influenced trials to uninfluenced trials FALSE
H2: Magnitude of AMP effect predicted by proportion of influenced trials to non-influenced trials Planned statistical model linear regression: AMP effect size ~ influence-awareness rate linear regression: AMP_effect_size ~ proportion_influenced TRUE
H3: Online and offline measures of influence correlate Planned variable(s) to measure/test Correlation between IA-AMP and post hoc awareness measures Correlation between online and offline measures TRUE
H3: Online and offline measures of influence correlate Planned processing/scoring Simple correlations Standard correlation analysis TRUE
H3: Online and offline measures of influence correlate Planned statistical model correlation analysis correlation analysis TRUE
H4: Online measure of influence predicts AMP effect better than offline measure Planned variable(s) to measure/test Regression: AMP effect size ~ IA-AMP + General Influence Regression: AMP_effect_size ~ proportion_influenced + general_influence TRUE
H4: Online measure of influence predicts AMP effect better than offline measure Planned processing/scoring Only awareness assessed during IA-AMP predicted AMP effect sizes Online measure predicted AMP effect size more greatly than offline measure TRUE
H4: Online measure of influence predicts AMP effect better than offline measure Planned statistical model Regression: AMP effect size ~ IA-AMP + Post hoc self-report Regression: AMP_effect_size ~ proportion_influenced + general_influence TRUE